The Scape Vision
Scape is building toward a future where commodity sector exposure can be accessed and settled entirely on-chain—with the option for physical backing when appropriate.
The journey has two phases:
Phase Name Status Target Phase 1 Synthetic Indices (s-baskets) Active Now (Testnet) Phase 2 Constraint Tokens (x-baskets) Roadmap Q2 2026
Phase 1: Synthetic Indices (Now)
What It Is
Sector commodity indices available as HIP-3 perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid.
s-baskets: sSEMIS, sDEFENSE, sAERO, sENERGY
Pricing: Oracle-fed, price-referenced
Backing: None (synthetic)
Access: Perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid testnet
Current Status
Component Status Index methodology Defined Oracle integration In progress (Provider TBD) HIP-3 deployment Testnet Market activation Implementation TBD
Why Start Synthetic?
Speed to market: No physical infrastructure required
Capital efficiency: Users can leverage price exposure
Market validation: Test demand before physical investment
Ecosystem alignment: Builds on Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 primitive
Phase 2: Constraint Tokens (Q2 2026)
What It Is
Physically-backed tokens representing audited warehouse holdings of sector commodities.
x-baskets: xSEMIS, xDEFENSE, xAERO, xENERGY
Pricing: NAV-based from inventory ledger
Backing: Physical warehouse receipts
Access: AP-only mint/redeem; retail accesses secondary market
Roadmap Only. No physical backing, warehouse operators, custody partners, or x-basket tokens exist today. Phase 2 is a future development target that may change or not occur.
Key Components
Component Description Status Warehouse Partners Store physical commodities TBD Custody Solution Secure warehouse receipts TBD Inventory Ledger On-chain proof of holdings Design phase AP Network Authorized create/redeem TBD NAV Oracle Calculate token value Design phase
Constraint Tokens Deep dive on the physical backing model.
Why Physical Backing?
Limitations of Synthetic
Synthetic indices (s-baskets) have limitations:
No delivery: Cannot take physical possession
Oracle dependency: Price is only as good as the feed
Funding costs: Perpetual holding has funding implications
Counterparty risk: Depends on market solvency
Benefits of Physical Backing
Constraint tokens (x-baskets) address these:
Redeemable: APs can redeem for physical delivery
NAV-based: Price anchored to audited inventory
Yield potential: Storage, financing, basis opportunities
Institutional use: Suitable for hedging actual exposure
Use Case Comparison
s-basket Use Cases
x-basket Use Cases
Best for:
Speculation on sector performance
Short-term exposure
Leverage-seeking participants
Price exposure without delivery needs
Not ideal for:
Physical delivery requirements
Long-term holding (funding costs)
Institutional hedging requiring delivery
Best for:
Institutional hedging
Physical delivery (via APs)
Long-term sector exposure
Basis exposure vs synthetics
Not ideal for:
High-leverage speculation
Retail physical redemption
Roadmap Timeline
Timeline is indicative. Actual delivery dates may vary based on development progress, partner availability, regulatory considerations, and market conditions.
2024-2025: Phase 1 Foundation
Milestone Target Index methodology finalized Complete Oracle provider selection In progress Testnet deployment In progress Market activation Q1 2025 (TBD) Mainnet deployment (TBD)
2026: Phase 2 Physical
Milestone Target Warehouse partner selection Q1 2026 (TBD) Custody solution integration Q1 2026 (TBD) Inventory ledger deployment Q2 2026 (TBD) AP network launch Q2 2026 (TBD) First x-basket launch Q2 2026 (TBD)
Governance Evolution
Index governance evolves across phases:
Aspect Phase 1 (Now) Phase 2 (Roadmap) Weight changes Fixed (TBD: governance or programmatic) Component adds/removes Manual (TBD) Rebalancing None (TBD) Fee parameters Fixed (TBD)
Governance Roadmap Future governance plans.
What Remains Unchanged
Across both phases:
Sector focus: Commodity baskets targeting supply chain sectors
Index composition: Same commodities in s-basket and x-basket variants
Hyperliquid native: Built on Hyperliquid infrastructure
Transparency: Public methodology and pricing
Next Steps