Skip to main content

The Scape Vision

Scape is building toward a future where commodity sector exposure can be accessed and settled entirely on-chain—with the option for physical backing when appropriate. The journey has two phases:
PhaseNameStatusTarget
Phase 1Synthetic Indices (s-baskets)ActiveNow (Testnet)
Phase 2Constraint Tokens (x-baskets)RoadmapQ2 2026

Phase 1: Synthetic Indices (Now)

What It Is

Sector commodity indices available as HIP-3 perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid.
  • s-baskets: sSEMIS, sDEFENSE, sAERO, sENERGY
  • Pricing: Oracle-fed, price-referenced
  • Backing: None (synthetic)
  • Access: Perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid testnet

Current Status

ComponentStatus
Index methodologyDefined
Oracle integrationIn progress (Provider TBD)
HIP-3 deploymentTestnet
Market activationImplementation TBD

Why Start Synthetic?

  1. Speed to market: No physical infrastructure required
  2. Capital efficiency: Users can leverage price exposure
  3. Market validation: Test demand before physical investment
  4. Ecosystem alignment: Builds on Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 primitive

Phase 2: Constraint Tokens (Q2 2026)

What It Is

Physically-backed tokens representing audited warehouse holdings of sector commodities.
  • x-baskets: xSEMIS, xDEFENSE, xAERO, xENERGY
  • Pricing: NAV-based from inventory ledger
  • Backing: Physical warehouse receipts
  • Access: AP-only mint/redeem; retail accesses secondary market
Roadmap Only. No physical backing, warehouse operators, custody partners, or x-basket tokens exist today. Phase 2 is a future development target that may change or not occur.

Key Components

ComponentDescriptionStatus
Warehouse PartnersStore physical commoditiesTBD
Custody SolutionSecure warehouse receiptsTBD
Inventory LedgerOn-chain proof of holdingsDesign phase
AP NetworkAuthorized create/redeemTBD
NAV OracleCalculate token valueDesign phase

Constraint Tokens

Deep dive on the physical backing model.

Why Physical Backing?

Limitations of Synthetic

Synthetic indices (s-baskets) have limitations:
  • No delivery: Cannot take physical possession
  • Oracle dependency: Price is only as good as the feed
  • Funding costs: Perpetual holding has funding implications
  • Counterparty risk: Depends on market solvency

Benefits of Physical Backing

Constraint tokens (x-baskets) address these:
  • Redeemable: APs can redeem for physical delivery
  • NAV-based: Price anchored to audited inventory
  • Yield potential: Storage, financing, basis opportunities
  • Institutional use: Suitable for hedging actual exposure

Use Case Comparison

Best for:
  • Speculation on sector performance
  • Short-term exposure
  • Leverage-seeking participants
  • Price exposure without delivery needs
Not ideal for:
  • Physical delivery requirements
  • Long-term holding (funding costs)
  • Institutional hedging requiring delivery

Roadmap Timeline

Timeline is indicative. Actual delivery dates may vary based on development progress, partner availability, regulatory considerations, and market conditions.

2024-2025: Phase 1 Foundation

MilestoneTarget
Index methodology finalizedComplete
Oracle provider selectionIn progress
Testnet deploymentIn progress
Market activationQ1 2025 (TBD)
Mainnet deployment(TBD)

2026: Phase 2 Physical

MilestoneTarget
Warehouse partner selectionQ1 2026 (TBD)
Custody solution integrationQ1 2026 (TBD)
Inventory ledger deploymentQ2 2026 (TBD)
AP network launchQ2 2026 (TBD)
First x-basket launchQ2 2026 (TBD)

Governance Evolution

Index governance evolves across phases:
AspectPhase 1 (Now)Phase 2 (Roadmap)
Weight changesFixed(TBD: governance or programmatic)
Component adds/removesManual(TBD)
RebalancingNone(TBD)
Fee parametersFixed(TBD)

Governance Roadmap

Future governance plans.

What Remains Unchanged

Across both phases:
  • Sector focus: Commodity baskets targeting supply chain sectors
  • Index composition: Same commodities in s-basket and x-basket variants
  • Hyperliquid native: Built on Hyperliquid infrastructure
  • Transparency: Public methodology and pricing

Next Steps